Multilinguals’ Choice of Language with Families, Friends and Acquaintances during Online and Offline Interaction

  • Olusiji Lasekan Ph.D. in English Linguistics, Lecturer at Universidad de La Frontera, Araucanea, Chile.
Keywords: Multilingual, India, Facebook, Language, Family, Friend, Acquaintance.


The aim of the present study is to investigate and compare the choice of language used in an online platform (Facebook) and during offline communication with reference to a family member, a friend and an acquaintance in the same multilingual speech community. As part of this study, a structured sociolinguistics questionnaire was administered to 38 multilingual postgraduate students. This is followed by interviewing selected focus group to elicit more information on various factors that influence their language behavior. The major finding of this study is that apart from family circle, a majority of multilingual users in India prefer to use English for Facebook private communications only among friends and acquaintances while Mother tongue is the dominant language use for offline communications.


Annamalai, E. (2001). Managing Multilingualism in India: Political and Linguistic Manifestations.

Baldridge, J. (1996). Reconciling Linguistic Diversity: The History and the Future of Language Policy in India. Internet, Http://www. Ling. Upenn. Edu/~ jason2/papers/ ….

Bapuji, B. (1994). Essays in the Sociology of Language.

Baruah, T. (2012). Effectiveness of Social Media as a Tool of Communication and Its Potential for Technology Enabled Connections: A Micro-level Study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(1), 1–10. 2250-3153

Bell, C., Fausset, C., & Farmer, S. (2013). Examining Social Media Use among Older Adults. Proceedings of the 24th ….

Bhattacharya, S. (2002). Languages in India: Their Status and Function.

Cunliffe, D., Morris, D., & Prys, C. (2013). Young Bilinguals’ Language Behaviour in Social Networking Sites: The Use of Welsh on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 339–361.

Hope, A., Schwaba, T., & Piper, A. (2014). Understanding Digital and Material Social Communications for Older Adults. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’14, 3903–3912.

Joshi, A., Ganu, A., & Chand, A. (2004). Keylekh: A Keyboard for Text Entry in Indic Scripts. CHI’04 Extended Abstracts …, 928–942.

Leading Countries Based on Number of Facebook Users 2014 | Statistic. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2015, from

McCroskey, J. (1977). Classroom Consequences of Communication Apprehension. Communication Education.

Pimienta, D., Prado, D., & Blanco, Á. (2009). Twelve Years of Measuring Linguistic Diversity in the Internet: Balance and Perspectives. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved March, 7, 2010.

Sahgal, A. (1991). Patterns of Language Use in a Bilingual Setting in India. English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives.

Sharma, J. (2014). “I am borrowing ya mixing ?” An Analysis of English-Hindi Code Mixing in Facebook, 116–126.

Shih, R. (2013). Effect of Using Facebook to Assist English for Business Communication Course Instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 52–59.

Social Media Site Usage 2014 | Pew Research Center. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2015, from

Taylor, D., Mahadevan, R., and Koshal, S. (1978). Language Choice in Bilingual Situation. In Papers in Indian Sociolinguistics.

Vasanta, D., Suvarna, A., Sireesha, J., & Raju, S. (2010). Language Choice and Language Use Patterns among Telugu-Hindi/Urdu-English Speakers in Hyderabad, India. International Conference on…, (1994).

Wang, C., & Chen, C. (2013). Effects of Facebook Tutoring on Learning English as a Second Language. Proceedings of the International Conference E-Learning 2013, (2009), 135–142.

World Internet Users Statistics and 2015 World Population Stats. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2015, from

How to Cite
Lasekan, O. (2018). Multilinguals’ Choice of Language with Families, Friends and Acquaintances during Online and Offline Interaction. LANGUAGE ART, 3(1), 85-96.